jus wondering:
whoever is against Bindrawale, do you guys do nitnem on regular basis?
Been trying to tie loose ends in my views.
or is it just who does nitnem on regular basis defend Bindrawale?
Whenever we have discussion on Bindrawale one of the top question is why take weapons inside Akal Takht?
most of us forgetting at one point or another we all had Khanda around our chains/necklace. To me swords daggars are weapons and we wear it proudly.
2nd most asked question is usually why use Akal Takht?
If any qovt. wants to show revenge against any kind of group, they will attack where it hurts the most.
They are evidence out there that qovt. was planning to attack Akal Takht. They made duplicate of Akal Takht and practiced.
GOOD READ:
Congress (I) started raising a force of Punjabi speaking non-Sikhs to malign the Akalis. The men would undergo a crash programme of learning Gurubani and Gurumukhi, growing beard and long hair so as to make them indistinguishable from the Sikhs. After training, these men were sent to Punjab to infiltrate into Gurudwaras, Akali ranks and the Sikh organisations and encourage extremism.
They were to incite hatred and create communal tensions, write threatening letters, carry out acts of bank robberies, sabotage, desecrating religious places, invoke strong police retaliation during demonstrations, arson and looting - all dressed up as Sikhs. Congress (I) being in power, they had immunity from prosecution and
Sikhs would get the blame. (Times of India, 26 February, 1984; P.T. I - press release from Amritsar of 23 Dec.1983; U.N. I- press release of 26 Feb 1984)
I read somewhere that Sikhs were promised their land by the govt. if we fought with them to kick british out. More than 70% who gave their lives were SIKH.
After that why wouldn't we want what was promised.
Again shady govt.
