What is a defination of sikh?
Why do we need a definition in the first place ??
The only reason I believe some people are looking to defining the undefinable is to prove that they are unique.
I believe a Sikh is a Hindu..
But we keep repeating we are different because "We believe God to be ONE."
But how does your belief in that god amounts to him being true and existent?. At one time whole of the world believed that earth is flat but that didn't changed the fact i.e. earth is round.
The fact that many Sikh use terms such as "Hindu Gods" tell us a lot. Probably for them the God of Hindus is different from Waheguru, the God of Muslims and the God of the Christians or the Jews."
God of Hindus is beyond number and count. One which can be counted can not be God it must be some object of perception.
" However, Gurujee has clearly told us that there is only ONE God."
I don't think Gurus taught about any God. They taught about one supreme primordial reality which is substratum of everything. It is my perception that modern Sikh scholars have taken the Christists picture of HInduism as Hinduism and have tried to diffrentiate Sikhism from Hinduism. A spiritual system ( i don't consider Abrahmic cults to be spiritual systems they are theological system) is known by its philosphy not by its rituals. Rituals are mere means not the goal. Goal is the realization of the truth as claimed by the Philosphy. In this light i don't see how the "Akal Purush" of the Granth Shahib is different from the "Brahmn" of the Vedas. The insights of Nanak are as typically Hindu as you can get.
The Self, the objectless self-contained consciousness, is nirguna, beyond the qualities that make for difference between human beings. As a contemporary spiritual teacher said: “What is Self-realization? By what does a ‘realized’ person distinguish himself? Very simple, the special thing about him is this: one who is ‘realized’, realizes that he is the same as everybody else.” The Self has no separate identity, neither individual nor communal.
When we get to this conceptual level, we can see that communal identity in Hindu-Sikh tradition is a superficial reality, relatively acceptable and inevitable in the temporal world, but unreal from the angle of the timeless and colourless Self. By contrast, it has an absolute value in Islam, which decides on eternal heaven and eternal hell on the basis of communal identity: as per the Quran, all “unbelievers” (Sikhs as much as Hindus) carry a one-way ticket to hell. At the fundamental level, for all its adoption of external elements following Islamic models, Sikhism is not a middling position between Hinduism and Islam. Sikhism has never repudiated the doctrine of the Self, which is entirely non-Islamic and entirely Hindu.
I am surprised you don't know such a simple thing when it comes to understanding the message of Gurus. Guru is not a simple human being you should know that. His conciousness is not the constricted conciousness of a normal human.
OK...
Jatt Sanjam Teerath una jugaa ka dharam hai, kal meh keerat Harnama
(Celibacy, self-discipline and pilgrimages were the essence of Dharma in those past ages; but in this Dark Age of Kali Yuga, the Praise of the Lord's Name is the essence of Dharma)"
Hindu saints (given some peoples stand that Gurus were not Hindus) too say the same. Here is what author of Ramcharit Manas Sri Tulsi Das has to say.
NAhi Kali Karam Na Dharam bibeku, Ram Nam Avlamban Eku
(In the age of Kaliyuga neither karma(action) nor bhakti (devotion) nor again Janana (knowledge) avails. Name of Rama is only resort.
What I am saying is that final truth of Sikhism i.e. Akal Purush is same as the "Brahmn" of Vedas. Ofcourse Sikhism has its own rituals and parapharnelia which is different from main stream Hinduism. The difference is in appearance and not in Philosophy.
If Sikhs feel they have different identity it is their choice. I do not detest it. But it shouldn't be born out of inferiorty complex viz a viz Islam & Christianity. But unfortunatly this is the case.
I repeat, the God of Nanak is the same as the supreme primordial reality of the Vedas called "Brahmn". And this is illuminator of the intellect, mind etc through which one count and conceive the world. Hence that supreme which is illuminator of this whole world is God of Hindus(I prefer the term reality instead of God).
As per Hindu and/or Sikh, there is not one god or two god. Instead
GOD ALONE IS.
Thanks