bhaji mainu v edai lagda^tusi ta SGGS kaafi bar padeya lagda
Seeing him from a distance, Krishna, the Lord, bowed and leaving his throne came to Sudama.Thanks for the quotes vishaka but all they show is that there was a zikar of hindu gods which i never denied. i didn't say that SGGS denied the existence of hindu gods. All i said was SGGS never praised or believed in the Hindu gods and their magic or whatever you call it.
i apologize ....theek karta mae .....gurbani naal sherkhani lai gustaakhi di maafi chauna sahib de darbaar .......khima da jachak hunda
*krishan brishan ko mae(kabhi) naa dheyaaoo EHDA HUNDA
mannu ess gal da nahi c pata ...may be mae galat samj geya ...yan eda da ee kujj ....actually ee te hun rubb ee jaanda k tusi eda de verses post karkey ki sabit karna chahunde c ....!!No one is telling anyone to worship Ram ( or anyone else for that matter )
The question is: Does SGGS deny the existence of Raja Ram of Ayodhya ?
No, It doesn't !
i m sorry to say .....but the verses u provided in following attachmentsSeeing him from a distance, Krishna, the Lord, bowed and leaving his throne came to Sudama.
here krishna considered as lord
i m sorry to say .....but the verses u provided in following attachments
Attachment 11321
Attachment 11319
Attachment 11318
are NOT from gurbani ....this is not gurbani ...not even aa single line
this is not gurbani
--------------------------------------------------------------
ਸਤਜੁਗਿ ਤੈ ਮਾਣਿਓ ਛਲਿਓ ਬਲਿ ਬਾਵਨ ਭਾਇਓ ॥
sathajug thai maaniou shhaliou bal baavan bhaaeiou ||
In the Golden Age of Sat Yuga, You were pleased to deceive Baal the king, in the form of a dwarf.
ਤ੍ਰੇਤੈ ਤੈ ਮਾਣਿਓ ਰਾਮੁ ਰਘੁਵੰਸੁ ਕਹਾਇਓ ॥
thraethai thai maaniou raam raghuvans kehaaeiou ||
In the Silver Age of Traytaa Yuga, You were called Raam of the Raghu dynasty.
ਦੁਆਪੁਰਿ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨ ਮੁਰਾਰਿ ਕੰਸੁ ਕਿਰਤਾਰਥੁ ਕੀਓ ॥
dhuaapur kirasan muraar kans kirathaarathh keeou ||
In the Brass Age of Dwaapur Yuga, You were Krishna; You killed Mur the demon and saved Kans.
ਉਗ੍ਰਸੈਣ ਕਉ ਰਾਜੁ ਅਭੈ ਭਗਤਹ ਜਨ ਦੀਓ ॥
ougrasain ko raaj abhai bhagatheh jan dheeou ||
You blessed Ugrasain with a kingdom, and You blessed Your humble devotees with fearlessness.
ਕਲਿਜੁਗਿ ਪ੍ਰਮਾਣੁ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰੁ ਅੰਗਦੁ ਅਮਰੁ ਕਹਾਇਓ ॥
kalijug pramaan naanak gur angadh amar kehaaeiou ||
In the Iron Age, the Dark Age of Kali Yuga, You are known and accepted as Guru Nanak, Guru Angad and Guru Amar Das.
~SGGS Ji ang 1390
No one is telling anyone to worship Ram ( or anyone else for that matter )
The question is: Does SGGS deny the existence of Raja Ram of Ayodhya ?
No, It doesn't !
So if i can't deny the existence of fairy god mothers or red faced green goblins or for that matter if i dont deny the existence of unicorns does that mean they exist?
Like Mahaj already mentioned. Ram in Guru Granth Sahib ji means something completely different from the King of Ayodhya.
https://www.unp.me/f15/ram-141222/#post1967486
Its more than just 'not denying'.
In SGGS at places Ram refers to God and in places refers to King of Ayodhya,
eh bareek jahi gall tuhaddi moti budhi ch kyu ni aa rahi ?
ਸਤਜੁਗਿ ਤੈ ਮਾਣਿਓ ਛਲਿਓ ਬਲਿ ਬਾਵਨ ਭਾਇਓ ॥
sathajug thai maaniou shhaliou bal baavan bhaaeiou ||
In the Golden Age of Sat Yuga, You were pleased to deceive Baal the king, in the form of a dwarf.
ਤ੍ਰੇਤੈ ਤੈ ਮਾਣਿਓ ਰਾਮੁ ਰਘੁਵੰਸੁ ਕਹਾਇਓ ॥
thraethai thai maaniou raam raghuvans kehaaeiou ||
In the Silver Age of Traytaa Yuga, You were called Raam of the Raghu dynasty.
ਦੁਆਪੁਰਿ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨ ਮੁਰਾਰਿ ਕੰਸੁ ਕਿਰਤਾਰਥੁ ਕੀਓ ॥
dhuaapur kirasan muraar kans kirathaarathh keeou ||
In the Brass Age of Dwaapur Yuga, You were Krishna; You killed Mur the demon and saved Kans.
ਉਗ੍ਰਸੈਣ ਕਉ ਰਾਜੁ ਅਭੈ ਭਗਤਹ ਜਨ ਦੀਓ ॥
ougrasain ko raaj abhai bhagatheh jan dheeou ||
You blessed Ugrasain with a kingdom, and You blessed Your humble devotees with fearlessness.
ਕਲਿਜੁਗਿ ਪ੍ਰਮਾਣੁ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰੁ ਅੰਗਦੁ ਅਮਰੁ ਕਹਾਇਓ ॥
kalijug pramaan naanak gur angadh amar kehaaeiou ||
In the Iron Age, the Dark Age of Kali Yuga, You are known and accepted as Guru Nanak, Guru Angad and Guru Amar Das.
~SGGS Ji ang 1390
5 7 lakh chooche khaa k ..ik gulabi jeeb vali billi ...hun hajj nu tur pai ....https://www.unp.me/f15/ram-141222/#post1967486
Its more than just 'not denying'.
In SGGS at places Ram refers to God and in places refers to King of Ayodhya,
eh bareek jahi gall tuhaddi moti budhi ch kyu ni aa rahi ?
Pata ni 22 ji eh neet aa ke apne aap nu samjhan di ghaat aa.5 7 lakh chooche khaa k ..ik gulabi jeeb vali billi ...hun hajj nu tur pai ....
beebe kabooter vali kahani parri kise ne..? ik kabooter hunda c rati barrey parr marney ohney ....jado ode kol kise ne jana ohne beeba bann k beh jana ...ethe v ik beeba kbooter turi firda.......jehra kehnda mae v te ehi kehnda c ................lol
gal karan piche jehri neet hhundi aa...ooh bahut farak paundi aa.....badneeti ..marri neet naal bolea sach ...jooth ton v marra hunda...
anyway.........breeek budhi valeo ..chalkian chaddo ..te apney chehre ton nikaab lao ........ee bahtt banni de start vala heading parro ....ee babe nanak lai keha jaa reha ...and praises aa....ee koi gurmat vallo farmaaan nai ditta jaa reha .....breek budhi valeo ...j tuahdi budhi bareek aa te ee gal di te thnu sari samj hunni aa.....
[SIZE=+1]ਸਵਈਏ ਮਹਲੇ ਪਹਿਲੇ ਕੇ ੧[/SIZE][SIZE=+1]
सवईए महले पहिले के १[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Sava▫ī▫e mahle pahile ke 1[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Swaiyas In Praise Of The First Mehl:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]ੴ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ ॥[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]ੴ सतिगुर प्रसादि ॥[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Ik▫oaʼnkār saṯgur parsāḏ.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]One Universal Creator God. By The Grace Of The True Guru:[/SIZE]
ee iss bani da heading da .......har ik bani da heading a ..te oss ehading de according oss vich bani aa.....hun breek budhi valea nu te ee sara pata hunna.......
piche jehe ik ajehe breek budhi ne ik pankti da hwala de k raula paa ta k baba nanak tambakoo peenda c......o te fer ohnu akal purakh ne samat bakshi ....umeed aa ethe v kise nu bakshega samat parmaatma
gurbani ch har bani de heading aa...jida anand bani aa .oss vich v koi toss hukam nai aa ...oo parmaatma nu paa laein vali awasta da jikar aa....eda e chandd ne...te gaathaaa v hae jiss vich khania rahi samjaea geya ........sid gosht vich yogian te breek budhi valea nu chuk chuk marea....jida japuji ch kida direct hukam vajda starting vich ||japu||
ik hor bareek budhi valey ne te ragmala da hawala de k raaga guruan nu raag bhagat banna ta....o te fer ohne dhyaan naal heading parrea hunna fer dhyaan naal ander ...te fer hatea ohh ...!!lol
ehi breeek budhi valea de sadka....darbar sahib vich moorti pooja shuru ho gayi c.....
hun fer breek budhi ne ,,meri uper kise breek gal nu farr laina .....beeba kaboter vang ..k mae v ehi kehnda c ....kehnda te c ..te pcihe neet ki kehndi c?
It should.Let me quote a post form sikh philosiphy network if that helps anyone understand better. The baani that you posted above is Bhatt-Bani not Gur-Bani or Bhagat-Bani.
Significance of Bhatt-Bani
"The Swayyas composed by the Bhatts are unique in the sense that they are testimony to the spiritual heights of Gurbani. The Bhatts did not belong to the family circle of the Gurus, nor were they associates of the Bhagats. They came to realize the Divine Essence present in the Gurus in person and in their sacred Word. Their recognition of the greatness of Gurus speaks eloquently in their verses and hymns.
The linking of Guru Nanak and other Gurus with Raja Janak, may be an off-shoot of the Bhatts’ way of looking at the historical-mythological tradition of India. They believe it was Nanak and none else who operated in the person of Ram and Krishna. This is their own unique way of expressing their sentiments. They adopted the poetic metre Swayya for paying tributes to the Gurus, even though they were quite familiar with the use of classical Raags in Gurbani. Whatever the methods and means they chose for their poetry, their dedication to the Gurus is evident and crystal clear."
The context in which everything said in Guru Granth Sahib ji is also important to get the complete meaning. Hope this helps.