Is Sikhism a sect of Hinduism

[Mahaj]

no it doesnt..... it does not mean business man or something.
dhillon mahinder
mahinder dhillon
sodhi ramdas (usually known)
ramdas sodhi
pata apa nu aje tak naam da nai ...gallan dasam dian?
level chaihda ik

 

[Dhillon]

Every single source and authority on Sikhism says Nanak was a bedi.

Dasam Granth says he was a Bedi.

tu apna alag hi jhanda chukkeya.

 

[Mahaj]

Fer fer raula

 

[kit walker]

Ahh Bedi / Mehta /Sodhi wala Raag Band Karo. Sare IK jot si. SGGS Ji Vich through IK waheguru di Upasna bare dasya gaya hai. baki thudai marji. ethe gal hinduism vs sikhism di ho rahi hai. Jive Islam Te Christianity oven hi Hinduism and Sikhism. Some Facts are Comman.

 

[userid114437]

no it doesnt..... it does not mean business man or something.
dhillon mahinder
mahinder dhillon
sodhi ramdas (usually known)
ramdas sodhi
pata apa nu aje tak naam da nai ...gallan dasam dian?
level chaihda ik

Hale taan basement cha entre hoye aa.oh v changi tara ni dekhi. Bahut level paye aa.

 

[Mahaj]

Big time raula

 

[tomarnidhi]

thats wat ur religion says !!! I don't respect any religion demeaning another

You want to prove your religion superior then dont become petty and put others down

Today I appreciate one thing abt my religion - Hinduism - we have never considered any faith beneath us!!

 

[Mahaj]

Shocking post, that's the best you can come up with ?

If you want to take it that way...good luck bro... peace

 

[Dhillon]

Today I appreciate one thing abt my religion - Hinduism - we have never considered any faith beneath us!!

There is a line in SGGS 'Mitti Musalman ki' for which 'Guru Arjun Dev' was tortured and murdered.

SGGS is quite critical of Hindu ways, but you'll hardly find any Hindu speaking ill of Granth Sahib and Sikh Gurus.

 

[Mahaj]

There is a line in SGGS 'Mitti Musalman ki' for which 'Guru Arjun Dev' was tortured and murdered.

SGGS is quite critical of Hindu ways, but you'll hardly find any Hindu speaking ill of Granth Sahib and Sikh Gurus.

Now I know why are you not getting ..... I was so freaking wrong
This post is entirely wrong ...some one would tell you real story

 

[Jaswinder Singh Baidwan]

Rule dhayan ch rakhya kro

https://www.unp.me/f15/rules-religion-and-politics-section-155115/

 

[@n@@m]

^^ veer R & p vich enj rule aje tak kise nu samajh nai aaya history says that

 

[pps309]

radha ji was spiritual wife and lover of shri krishna....according to mythology radha ji was a avtar of goddess laxmi ji wife of vishnu ji and krishna ji was avtar of vishnu ji.....is avtar ke time unhe shrap tha ki wo aapas mein shadi nahi kar payenge so they were not married but still everone knows radha krishna

thanks, so Radha ji was wife of Shri Krishna. Still confused, spiritual wife?? How can she be wife without marriage? Was that possible then?

 

[@n@@m]

aho as written above they were avtars and for sake of that shrap they didn't get married radha ji ne mann hi mann krishna nu apna husband manya si so ona ne vyaah nai karvaya si

 

[pps309]

aho as written above they were avtars and for sake of that shrap they didn't get married radha ji ne mann hi mann krishna nu apna husband manya si so ona ne vyaah nai karvaya si

possible...........