Arundhati Roy: Power Politics

power politics is a collection of many essays written by arundhati roy.

at places it seems that aundhati roy is a left wing extremist.
and sometimes she's pretty pseudo-intellectual.:nerd

but all in all, it's good non mainstream literature.
and roy is convincing about her views at exceptional places.

the book gets 2 out of 10 points.

editorial reviews: Amazon.com: Power Politics: Arundhati Roy: Books
 

prithvi.k

on off on off......
she sucks..some one should kill this moron..
dude urs id is "Bhaarat ki Mitti" and starting thead of this bharat ki gadar da...she saves afzal guru yaad hai who was he... google u will get the history


now going afterwards i will come and say the great real things about this dirty face looking women
 

prithvi.k

on off on off......
secularists show double standards

Today,self-styled secularists in the MEDIA and LITERAY world resort to double standards while claiming to be secular.Thus, Suzanna Arundhati Roy is paid/gots lots of dollars from the anti-indian groups.
Lets starts with Batla House, for the benefit of those who might be unfamiliar with the name, is the site of Inspector M C Sharma's death. Or, as hard-core 'secularists' would have it, it is the site of the "alleged" encounter on September 19 2008 with "reported" militants who were supposedly hiding in Delhi's Jamia Nagar.She echoed the call for a judicial probe on Batla House encounter in delhi..The Congress probably doesn't give a hoot for Arundhati Roy's readers as they where in the power,if its was some other party like BJP sure they have created huge Hungama..like innocent killed..minority killed..all those shits.yeah they were innocent students..when police went to the house where they staying they reply the police by fireing on them,,,even police found pic of osama bin laden,notes on how to make bombs,jihad books etc from their computers harddisk,Woow what a good innocent students ther r really...

More...Her statement that "India needs Azadi from Kashmir as much as Kashmir needs azadi from India" is seditious. The intellectual and literary community should strongly condemn such anti-national pronouncements, which are being given legitimacy by pseudo-secularists. "Obnoxious propaganda by the likes of Arundhati Roy must be firmly countered". Also for her comments on kashmir congress spokesman remarked "She (Roy) is a loose cannon who has abused liberal traditions of India to its fullest,"

She defends M F Husain (who draws nude pic of god & goddess) but lambasts Taslima Nasreen (taslima who written truth books about womens life in muslim community,when she was in hyderabad, she was bitten by muslim community by throwing flower plots,chairs,books whatever they got on their hand ,like animlas they behave with this lady,full clip was came on news channels,,, but she Arundhati roy womens support group/rights doesnt say anything ? ).......Likewise,her supporter and user the congress allows thousands of bangladeshi (now reach lakhs) to take indian citizenship but dithers when it comes to the Ram Temple and other issues.Its time to ask secularists what exactly their idea of secularism is.

Does she says or written any thing on latest mumbai attack.....no she wont,as here she wont get any money for her dirty 3rd class anti-india activities or if even she says something wrong peoples will beat her with shoes,thatz she knows verywell...as public anger was on high on that attack.WellThere are many things about this dirty writter i dont want to waste my time on this..just google for more real face of her to get exposed...
 

prithvi.k

on off on off......
Some background of her i got -
An Ultimate female Traitor molded by POPE agents in KERALA.
Suzanne Arundhati Roy"s mother is a Christian who got divorced from her Hindu husband.
Arundhati Roy could not forgive her Hindu father and her hatred for her father made her a fanatical anti-Hindu woman. Her native place is Ayemenem, Kerala where she was born on the 24 the November of 1961. Suzanne Arundhati Roy"s hatred for Hindus got a boost from her fellow Christian fanatics who used to attack all Hindus as a past-time even during her school days. Having tasted utter poverty in a tea plantation (her father was a tea plantation worker), she wanted to earn money by hook or by crook and she succeeded in doing so when she got full support from Pope and his nominees in India (bishops and other sundry arch bishops in Kerala did everything to financially feed her fanatic anti-Hindu postures. Their aim was to make Christianity the major religion of India and their goal was well understood and served by this rags-to-riches Arundhati Roy, now a intellectual lady who has won big prices with some friendly push from all-pervasive Chrisitan lobbies in the UK/US.

when starting a plotical topic plz see the background of that person
 
@prithvi

arundhati is controversial and at some places i too thought she's a lil anti hindu.
but she's not anti-national or anything like that ..

the fact that we have people like her shows that india is - at least in this way - a true democracy where everyone can axpress his or her personal view.

and only if indians practise their right of critisizing their government will india ever progress.

and she does have talent.
her first book "the god of small things" is really nice. :)
 

prithvi.k

on off on off......
true democracy ??? democracy doesn't means that any one can do any illegal or anything ... itz should be in limits... wrong comments on kashmir,saveing terrorist,anti relgious activities is true democracy!.... like these persons fools ppl by saying freedom of speech..as its democracy then this below what i have founded is best democracy



Courtesy: Hindustan Times
When Arundhati Roy visited the Delhi University campus on February 13, she was greeted with a slipper thrown by student group Youth Unity for Vibrant Action (YUVA). The slipper was auctioned for Rs 101, 000 at Jantar Mantar on Thursday.
\"When Arundhati Roy came to our campus, a member named Asif Kumar threw his slipper at her to protest her statement that Kashmir should be given to Pakistan. Her statement is against our national interest,\" said Jairam Pandey, national convenor, YUVA.
The slipper was bought by businessman Amitabh Kumar. \"I was in Connaught Place for a meeting, when I went for a walk to Jantar Mantar after lunch. There I saw a demonstration by YUVA activists, who were auctioning the slipper,\" he said.


www.kashmiris-in-exile.blogspot.com/2009/02/yet-another-booker-for-arundhati-roy.html
 

Abhinav_86

New member
there should be a nation wide protest against this bitch Arundhati Roy.She is just a limelight seeking piece of bullshit, bloody bitch and whore
 
rofl@ "her statement is against our national interest"


It's called Freedom of Speech. Mothertruckers.


Maybe if everyone had the golden balls to criticize the Govt then India would be in a better state.
 

pps309

Prime VIP
Nations own beloved Nehru said following about kashmir.......Nehru the biggest anti-national became the first PM.

My reaction to today's court order directing the Delhi Police to file an FIR against me for waging war against the state: Perhaps they should posthumously file a charge against Jawaharlal Nehru too. Here is what he said about Kashmir:

1. In his telegram to the Prime Minister of Pakistan, the Indian Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru said, “I should like to make it clear that the question of aiding Kashmir in this emergency is not designed in any way to influence the state to accede to India. Our view which we have repeatedly made public is that the question of accession in any disputed territory or state must be decided in accordance with wishes of people and we adhere to this view.” (Telegram 402 Primin-2227 dated 27th October, 1947 to PM of Pakistan repeating telegram addressed to PM of UK).

2. In other telegram to the PM of Pakistan, Pandit Nehru said, “Kashmir's accession to India was accepted by us at the request of the Maharaja's government and the most numerously representative popular organization in the state which is predominantly Muslim. Even then it was accepted on condition that as soon as law and order had been restored, the people of Kashmir would decide the question of accession. It is open to them to accede to either Dominion then.” (Telegram No. 255 dated 31 October, 1947).

ACCESSION ISSUE

3. In his broadcast to the nation over All India Radio on 2nd November, 1947, Pandit Nehru said, “We are anxious not to finalise anything in a moment of crisis and without the fullest opportunity to be given to the people of Kashmir to have their say. It is for them ultimately to decide ------ And let me make it clear that it has been our policy that where there is a dispute about the accession of a state to either Dominion, the accession must be made by the people of that state. It is in accordance with this policy that we have added a proviso to the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir.”

4. In another broadcast to the nation on 3rd November, 1947, Pandit Nehru said, “We have declared that the fate of Kashmir is ultimately to be decided by the people. That pledge we have given not only to the people of Kashmir and to the world. We will not and cannot back out of it.”

5. In his letter No. 368 Primin dated 21 November, 1947 addressed to the PM of Pakistan, Pandit Nehru said, “I have repeatedly stated that as soon as peace and order have been established, Kashmir should decide of accession by Plebiscite or referendum under international auspices such as those of United Nations.”

U.N. SUPERVISION

6.In his statement in the Indian Constituent Assembly on 25th November, 1947, Pandit Nehru said, “In order to establish our bona fide, we have suggested that when the people are given the chance to decide their future, this should be done under the supervision of an impartial tribunal such as the United Nations Organisation. The issue in Kashmir is whether violence and naked force should decide the future or the will of the people.”

7.In his statement in the Indian Constituent Assembly on 5th March, 1948, Pandit Nehru said, “Even at the moment of accession, we went out of our way to make a unilateral declaration that we would abide by the will of the people of Kashmir as declared in a plebiscite or referendum. We insisted further that the Government of Kashmir must immediately become a popular government. We have adhered to that position throughout and we are prepared to have a Plebiscite with every protection of fair voting and to abide by the decision of the people of Kashmir.”

REFERENDUM OR PLEBISCITE

8.In his press-conference in London on 16th January, 1951, as reported by the daily ‘Statesman' on 18th January, 1951, Pandit Nehru stated, “India has repeatedly offered to work with the United Nations reasonable safeguards to enable the people of Kashmir to express their will and is always ready to do so. We have always right from the beginning accepted the idea of the Kashmir people deciding their fate by referendum or plebiscite. In fact, this was our proposal long before the United Nations came into the picture. Ultimately the final decision of the settlement, which must come, has first of all to be made basically by the people of Kashmir and secondly, as between Pakistan and India directly. Of course it must be remembered that we (India and Pakistan) have reached a great deal of agreement already. What I mean is that many basic features have been thrashed out. We all agreed that it is the people of Kashmir who must decide for themselves about their future externally or internally. It is an obvious fact that even without our agreement no country is going to hold on to Kashmir against the will of the Kashmiris.”

9.In his report to All Indian Congress Committee on 6th July, 1951 as published in the Statesman, New Delhi on 9th July, 1951, Pandit Nehru said, “Kashmir has been wrongly looked upon as a prize for India or Pakistan. People seem to forget that Kashmir is not a commodity for sale or to be bartered. It has an individual existence and its people must be the final arbiters of their future. It is here today that a struggle is bearing fruit, not in the battlefield but in the minds of men.”

10.In a letter dated 11th September, 1951, to the U.N. representative, Pandit Nehru wrote, “The Government of India not only reaffirms its acceptance of the principle that the question of the continuing accession of the state of Jammu and Kashmir to India shall be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations but is anxious that the conditions necessary for such a plebiscite should be created as quickly as possible.”

WORD OF HONOUR

11.As reported by Amrita Bazar Patrika, Calcutta, on 2nd January, 1952, while replying to Dr. Mookerji's question in the Indian Legislature as to what the Congress Government going to do about one third of territory still held by Pakistan, Pandit Nehru said, “is not the property of either India or Pakistan. It belongs to the Kashmiri people. When Kashmir acceded to India, we made it clear to the leaders of the Kashmiri people that we would ultimately abide by the verdict of their Plebiscite. If they tell us to walk out, I would have no hesitation in quitting. We have taken the issue to United Nations and given our word of honour for a peaceful solution. As a great nation we cannot go back on it. We have left the question for final solution to the people of Kashmir and we are determined to abide by their decision.”

12.In his statement in the Indian Parliament on 7th August, 1952, Pandit Nehru said, “Let me say clearly that we accept the basic proposition that the future of Kashmir is going to be decided finally by the goodwill and pleasure of her people. The goodwill and pleasure of this Parliament is of no importance in this matter, not because this Parliament does not have the strength to decide the question of Kashmir but because any kind of imposition would be against the principles that this Parliament holds. Kashmir is very close to our minds and hearts and if by some decree or adverse fortune, ceases to be a part of India, it will be a wrench and a pain and torment for us. If, however, the people of Kashmir do not wish to remain with us, let them go by all means. We will not keep them against their will, however painful it may be to us. I want to stress that it is only the people of Kashmir who can decide the future of Kashmir. It is not that we have merely said that to the United Nations and to the people of Kashmir, it is our conviction and one that is borne out by the policy that we have pursued, not only in Kashmir but everywhere. Though these five years have meant a lot of trouble and expense and in spite of all we have done, we would willingly leave if it was made clear to us that the people of Kashmir wanted us to go. However sad we may feel about leaving we are not going to stay against the wishes of the people. We are not going to impose ourselves on them on the point of the bayonet.”

KASHMIR'S SOUL

13.In his statement in the Lok Sabha on 31st March, 1955 as published in Hindustan Times New Delhi on Ist April, 1955, Pandit Nehru said, “Kashmir is perhaps the most difficult of all these problems between India and Pakistan. We should also remember that Kashmir is not a thing to be bandied between India and Pakistan but it has a soul of its own and an individuality of its own. Nothing can be done without the goodwill and consent of the people of Kashmir.”

14.In his statement in the Security Council while taking part in debate on Kashmir in the 765th meeting of the Security Council on 24th January, 1957, the Indian representative Mr. Krishna Menon said, “So far as we are concerned, there is not one word in the statements that I have made in this council which can be interpreted to mean that we will not honour international obligations. I want to say for the purpose of the record that there is nothing that has been said on behalf of the Government of India which in the slightest degree indicates that the Government of India or the Union of India will dishonour any international obligations it has undertaken.”

Source: The Hindu : News / National : They can file a charge posthumously against Jawaharlal Nehru too: Arundhati Roy


hamme to lut liya milke Gandhi Nehru walo ne
inn dhoti walo ne, inn topi walo ne
laga di thi jaan ki baazi mughalo ko dorrane mein
fir se ghulam karva diya dogra gaddaro ne

hamme to lut liya milke Gandhi Nehru walo ne
inn dhoti walo ne, inn topi walo ne

mita diya tha farak ucch-neech gore-kaalein mein,
fir se jakad liya brahamwadi soch walo ne
Ambedkar, Teressa aur Osho ko de ye gaali
chanakya, modi aur rajiv ko milti hai taali

hamme to lut liya milke Gandhi Nehru walo ne
inn dhoti walo ne, inn topi walo ne
 

samsujata

Expert
@pps309 Nice One! I'd wish from heart that Kashmir should stay with India, however, if people of Kashmir wish to head to Pakistan, then that shall be allowed!! You're right Ms. Roy!!!:wor:wah
@all no hard feelings, it's time to act as a human being, not any random nationalist, patriot or absurd!!:w:pr:yes
 
Top