Juvenile Justice Bill gets elders’ nod too

Jaswinder Singh Baidwan

Akhran da mureed
Staff member
2015_12largeimg23_Wednesday_2015_0123358-1.jpg


Juveniles aged 16 years and above will now be prosecuted as adults for heinous crimes after Parliament today passed a Bill in this regard.
Passed by the Lok Sabha in May 2014, the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Bill was today discussed in the Rajya Sabha against the backdrop of uproar over the release of a juvenile convict in the gang-rape and murder of 23-year-old Nirbhaya on December 16, 2012.
Nation: ‘Bill a step forward, but...’
The Bill was passed by the Rajya Sabha with voice vote after a walkout by Left parties which wanted it to be sent to a select committee.
Women and Child Development Minister Maneka Gandhi said the earlier legislation was a "nuanced" one and needed to act as a "deterrent". She said the incidents of heinous crimes by juveniles aged 16 years and above were on the rise. She cited statistics to support her contention.
She said there was a two-level check to determine whether a child should be tried as an adult. “If someone below 18 commits a crime that falls in heinous category, that includes rape, murder and arson, he will be brought before a Juvenile Justice Board that will not comprise lawyers or police officers, but psychologists, social workers and experts. They will decide whether the crime has been committed with an adult mind,” the minister said.
She said such a juvenile would be provided lawyers. “Again, the court decides whether he will be tried as a juvenile or an adult and the child gets a second chance. If the child is tried as an adult, he has the right to appeal before a high court and the Supreme Court. If sentenced, he will be sent to a borstal till he turns 21, not to an adult jail. There are no borstals now, but will be created under the new system,” the minister said.
She explained when the child turned 21, it would be ascertained if he had been reformed after which he would be released. If not, he would have to serve full sentence, whatever it may be. Leader of the Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad pointed out that there had been several cases when juveniles had taken to crime at the instance of adults.
Akali MP Naresh Gujral sought clarity on the definition of “heinous crime”.
Addressing concerns on the state of juvenile homes, Maneka Gandhi said regular monitoring and social audit of these facilities would be carried out.
 

Miss Alone

Prime VIP
Important takeaways from today passage of bill in the parliament:

1. Public pressure worked after months and united the parliamentarians to seat in Rajya Sabha to pass the Juvenile Justice bill.

2.The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Amendment Bill 2015 was introduced in Parliament last year after huge public outrage as because one of the rapists in Jyoti Singh’s case was a few months short of 18 yrs, which forced the court to release him after minimum punishment.

3. The bill was passed by the Lok Sabha in May and now it needs President’s assent to become law.

4.Nirbhaya’s parents were also present in the Rajya Sabha while lawmakers debated and discussed the bill.

5. Congress and the Trinamool Congress who till last week had demanded that this crucial bill be sent to a select committee withdrew their demand, while the Left parties, the Samajwadi Party, the NCP, DMK, the AIADMK persisted in the demand and Left parties led by Sitaram Yechury walks out of Rajya Sabha after Deputy Chairperson PJ Kurien refuses to entertain their request of sending the bill to select committee.

6. The bill allows a juvenile of 16 years or older to be tried as an adult and the decision will be taken by the Juvenile Justice board, which will have a judicial magistrate and two social workers as members. If the board decides against it, the juvenile will be sent for rehabilitation.

7. Justice Board will first decide whether crime, was “child-like” or was committed in “adult frame of mind”.

8. India is a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child which mandates that all children under the age of 18 years be treated equal. The pending bill has been criticised for violation of the Convention.

9. JD(U)’s Kehkeshen Parveen who was also a former Bihar women commission chief wanted to know how the government despite being a signatory to the UN Charter of Rights of the Child was reducing the age of juvenile criminality from 18 to 16 years. Rather than enacting a law she urged the government to focus on education, prevention and bridging the disparities in society.
 
Top