Is Sikhism a sect of Islam ?

Ramta

Member
- -
- -

It sure must be...If this article is to be believed, the author of which doesn't want to be named(for some reason).

- -
- -

Excerpts :

"Guru Nanak also married in a Muslim family. This point is very important because no respectable Muslim family would have taken Nanak as a son-in-law, unless he was known to be a Muslim. Nanak lived in a country under Muslim rule where the marriage of a Muslim woman to a non-Muslim would on no account be tolerated. This clearly indicates that Guru Nanak was accepted as a Muslim by his contemporaries."

"Baba Nanak, by birth, was a Hindu. The elasticity of Hinduism makes it difficult to draw a line, crossing which a man ceases to be a Hindu. Deficiency in one's beliefs in the doctrines of Hinduism can be compensated by one's way of living and customs. But if one mixes with Muslims to such an extent that he eats and drinks with them and publicly performs religious rites of Islam, one would never be tolerated by Hindu society. The whole history of Sikhism shows that its founder, though born a Hindu, mixed with Muslims, joined in their prayers and performed other Islamic obligations, all in public. He wore none of the marks of Hindus upon him. On the other hand, he dressed like a Muslim and had all the insignia of a Muslim faqir on him. He passed his days with Muslim pirs and saints and ate and drank with them. It was a Muslim sufi he constantly turned to for advice and there is not a single instance in his life which indicated that he bowed his head to a Hindu pandit. There are many places associated with his name, where he is known to have performed Chillas, Nanak's chilla at Sirsa, a small town in the Punjab, is an example. (Chilla is an Islamic form of meditation). Travelling through Muslim countries he reached Mecca where he performed Haj (pilgrimage) and is also known to have visited the holy city of Medina. His choicest friend during these travels was a Muslim, Sheikh Farid, in whose company he passed twelve years of his life. Baba Nanak, while on pilgrimage, dressed like a pilgrim, carried with him a stick, Quran, a prayer mat and a water jug for performing ablution. Even his first four successors are represented in pictures as Muslims, carrying rosaries in their hands."

"The following passages are quoted from the third edition of Bala Sahib's Janam Sakhi, printed by the press, Anarkali, Lahore in the early part of this century.
On page 134 of Janam Sakhi, we read, The Quran is divided into thirty sections, proclaim thou, this Quran in the four comers of this world. Declare the glory of one name only for none other is an associate with me. Nanak proclaims the word of God that came to him, thou hast been granted the rank of Sheikh, so thou shouldst abolish the worship of gods and goddesses and the old Hindu idol - temples. The fundamental article of the Islamic faith, the Kalima, has been given the greatest stress in Janam Sakhi.

A few Shaloks (verses) from this Sakhi read :
I have repeated one Kalima, there is none other.
I have repeated one Kalima, there is none other.
Those who repeat the Kalima and are not devoid of the faith, shall not be burned on fire.
Repeat the Holy Kalima of the Prophet, it shall cleanse thee of all sins.
By repeating the Kalima, the punishment of this world, as well as the next is averted.
Who ever repeats the Kalima, how shall he be punished? the merit of repeating the Kalima is that a person is cleansed of his sins."

CLICK TO READ MORE

- -
- -

Note...the article in the above provided link, curiously, doesn't mention the name of the author.
Some ISI-Akali clown settled in GB-Toronto maybe...

Thanks

- -
- -
 
Mitra, NAHI Sikhism is NOT a sect of ANY religion. Thnx for questioning this, as many laws in India still consider Sikhs as a sect of Hinduism, which we are NOT!

Baki de apne, apne vichaar sanjhe karo!
 

Ramta

Member
- -
- -

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]By and by...[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]I don't wish to know wrote that article on 'punjabilok.com' and I don't care to know[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif][FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]who really and when set the stage for the Sikh to dance which is the most comic tragedy of all times in India.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Now coming back to Sikhism as a sect of Islam !! [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Okay.. I have some knowledge about Islam...[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]let's see... what is the basis of Islam.. the fundamentals on which it is formed.. [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]1. God revealed his direct word for mankind to Muhammad (CE 570–632) and other prophets,[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]including Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus. [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]2. Muhammad is the last or the seal of the prophets. [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]3. His preachings for humankind will last until qiyamah (The Day of the Resurrection). [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]4. Main written record of revelation to humankind is the Qur'an , which is flawless, immutable,[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]and the final revelation of God to humanity. [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]5. Parts of the Gospels, Torah and Jewish prophetic books (though originally divine in their nature)[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]have been forgotten, [/FONT][FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]misinterpreted, incorrectly edited by humans, or distorted by their followers[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]and thus their original message [/FONT][FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]has been corrupted over time. With that perspective,[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Qur'an is a correction of Jewish and Christian scriptures, and a final revelation.[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Now lets see.. how Sikhism fits into it...[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]no. 1 & 2 say that god stopped giving revelations to humans after Muhammad... I don't why... [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]but he did… he is God... he can do anything...[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]but all Sikh gurus were born after that... what does it mean... [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]they are the bunch of frauds... [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]I don't believe that but if Sikhism is Islam.. that’s what it is.. [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]no. 3 says that his teaching are for the time up to resurrection day... qiyamat or judgment day.. [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]god will make dead rise from their graves and do the judgment.. [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Hold on.. but Sikhs cremate their dead.. so how they will be resurrected...[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]that means they will not get salvation...[/FONT][FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]all Sikhs without salvation !! ( pity )[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]no. 4 & 5 says that Qur'an is the only right revelation.. and the last one... [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]so what is Shri Guru Granth Sahib ?? a blasphemy [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]what about gurus shabads in it.. another blasphemy [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]what is gurus claim that they are getting it from god.. blasphemy [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]So any body who believes in it, is actually playing in hands of Satan and will burn in hell forever..[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]There are also five pillars of Islam [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Shahadah: Testifying that there is none worthy of worship except God (Tawheed)[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger (Nubuwwah). [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Salah: Performing the five daily prayers. [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Sawm: Fasting from dawn to dusk in the month of Ramadan. [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Zakat: Giving Zakaah (charity). [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Hajj: The Pilgrimage to Makkah during the month of Dhul Hijjah, which is compulsory[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]once in a lifetime for one who has the ability to do it. [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Do Sikhs do these things too... [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]So Sikhs don't believe in Omkar or Waheguru and only believe in Allah.. [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]..they perform nawaz five times a day.. [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]..they fast in month of Ramadan.. [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]..and they go to hajj at least once in their lifetime.. [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]I am a Sikh and have lived in India... I am 30 years old. ... I have not seen any Sikh doing any of these...[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]May be they do these things in Great Britain and Canada.. I have never been to those countries..[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]so can’t comment.. [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]that all makes sense to me... Sikhs are Muslims..[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]but everything they do or believe in will ensure that they will burn in hell forever..[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Hindus will join them there.. because they don't believe in these things of Islam..[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]they believe in other gods too..[/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]at least Hindus and Sikhs will be in same category on judgment day..[/FONT][FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]but I know one thing for sure..[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]these khalistaanis will be shouting at Allah not to put them with Hindus[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]reason being they are a bit different than Hindus.. they must be muslims…[/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]But are they really different ??[/FONT]

[/FONT][FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]Thanks[/FONT]

- -
- -
 
Similar beliefs doesn't mean that Sikhism has been borne out of Islam. In fact, try checking out the Bible. Sikhism also share similar views in some aspects to Christianity. But does that mean Sikhism is also a sect of Christianity?
 

J@tti

..Majajan..
:dfm

o 22.. decide karla pehla.. sect of hindu and ke islam.. how did you miss jews by the way

and no I din read your post... it is freaking long.. if you want people to know your view point be concise and ofcourse original to retain the interest
 
- -
- -

Travelling through Muslim countries he reached Mecca where he performed Haj (pilgrimage) and is also known to have visited the holy city of Medina. CLICK TO READ MORE

- -
- -

Note...the article in the above provided link, curiously, doesn't mention the name of the author.
Some ISI-Akali clown settled in GB-Toronto maybe...

Thanks

- -
- -

Guru ji never performed hajj.......if hr performed hajj then why he slept in opposittr direction (lags towards kaaba)??????????? make sm sense plz
 

Ramta

Member
- -
- -

In order to bolster their separateness from Hinduism, Sikh separatists have magnified the Islamic element in Sikhism. An element of this tendency is the replacement of Sanskrit-based terms with Persian terms, e.g. the Hari Mandir, "Vishnu temple", in Amritsar is preferably called Darbar Sahib by the Akalis, "venerable court session (of the Timeless one)".

The Neo-Sikh even propogated the by now widespread story that the foundation stone of the Hari Mandir was laid by the Sufi pir Mian Mir. Repetition of this myth prompted many people including from the Sikh community to carry out a detailed survey of the oldest and modernest sources pertaining to the construction of the Hari Mandir. Found no trace of Mian Mir. But the Hardliners of the Singh-Sabha(singh-Safa) variety continue to prop up a blatant forgery simply because it has become popular and is being patronised by those who control the neo-Sikh establishment.(Canadian Visa anyone????)

Sikh self-historiographers have filled the Sikh history with concoctions, starting with insertions and changes in 19th-century editions of older texts, all of it in unsubtle appropriation of the latest ideological fashions of Anglo-secularists. (Rajendra Singh, a Sikh anti-separatist author claims that even (not to say especially) the key moments of Sikh history are often concoctions. He also points out that many stories about the lives of the Gurus are obvious calks on Puranic or Islamic stories.)

We are face to face with a strange kind of Sikhism. The Sikh Gurus had worked and fought for the resurgence of Hinduism but now we are told that this resurgence is precisely the cause of Sikh uneasiness. Guru Govind Singh started sending Sikh Gyanis to Varanasi to learn Sanskrit and to study the Epics, the Puranas and other classics to understand the Adi Granth itself, but the neo-Akali ideologues find Sanskrit and these classics objectionable. Maharaja Ranjit Singh banned cow-killing in his kingdom and a hundred Sikhs were blown to smithereens by the British because they stood for cow-protection, but now it is an anathema to secularist Akali scholars. The fact is that it is not the old Sikhism of the Gurus but a new version of it which has been taking shape under the impact of very different ideological and political forces that we are meeting. This neo-Akalism is a child of self-alienation and spiritual illiteracy and is at odds not only with Hinduism but for that very reason with Sikhism itself.

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have somebody write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new history. Before long that nation will begin to forget what it is and what it was... The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting.[/FONT]


Read this Western Keshdhari clown :

"...Sikhs who have cut hair are forced to wear helmets.Ladies are forced to wear helmets.Turbaned sikhs are exempted not due to some respect for sikhism but because poor person wont be able to handle a turban and then a specially designed large helmet over it.We sikhs need to give up this type of THANKFUL ATTITUDE.To be frank in my eyes its an indication of MENTAL SLAVERY..."

"...If cow slaughter is allowed in Punjab,sikhs wont force hindus to slaugter or eat cows.Poultry farms are a decent business in Punjab.In the same way beef business can help some farmers..."

"...Cow slaughter has NOTHING to do with showing disrespect to hindus.Sikhs dont cut hair and hindus cut hair...In the same way, sikhs eating beef wont be showing disrespect to the minority hindu population in Punjab..."



Pity the Brahmininical liar Bhai Gurudas never could grasp what this great Sikhi means...
This RSS puppet never realised that Ahmad Shah Abdali had done a very progressive thing
when he slaughtered cows in Har Mandir...

Millions are slanderers, millions are apostates and
millions of wicked persons are untrue to their salt.
Unfaithful, ungrateful, thieves, vagabonds and millions
of other infamous persons are there.
Thousands are there who are slayers
of Brahmin, cow, and their own family.
Vaar 1. Pauri 21, Vaaran Bhai Gurdasji


Even Guru Amardasji seems to have been manipulated by the evil Brahmins
and Hindus to declare the following in the Guru Granth Sahib:



"If a Brahmin kills a cow or a female infant,
and accepts the offerings of an evil person,
he is cursed with the leprosy of curses and criticism;
he is forever and ever filled with egotistical pride"
Page 1413, Shri Guru-Granthji

Mark Twain was right.

Thanks

- -
- -


 

munda_wakhre_type_da

-- Kem da Gui --
:dfm

o 22.. decide karla pehla.. sect of hindu and ke islam.. how did you miss jews by the way


o nai yaar main ta kenda asin sikh christanity to bane haaan..

bhia saab bhai jesus singh je western side waaleya ne hi sade guruan nu raah dkhaya c lagda.. :nerd



dekh bai bulle na asin hindua cho na asin musalmaana cho.. u c baba jesus de daadi v c lambe lambe baal v c.. :roll:roll:roll

ina bot hai k singhaa ne una to hi gyaan prapat kita thru gurus..

hun khush hai..

tu kaanu fajool di kaanwa rouli payi k sikh eh sikh oho. tu jidan kenda udan man lende haaan.. :roll:roll:roll
tu chanda ki hain oh das..









oo sach hun tu kena k CHRISTANITY = KRISHAN+NITI so ultimately asin hinduaa to hi aye ne

rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

bro u r funny seriously
 

Ramta

Member
- -
- -

T.P. Hughes’ Dictionary of Islam, written in the British-Indian colonial context, devotes the third-longest of its articles (after Muhammad and Quran) to Sikhism. "it must be a strange sect of Islam where the word ‘Mohammed’ does not occur even once in the writings of its founder, Nanak."

Nor did later Gurus include the praise of Mohammed in the Guru Granth.

In a concerted effort the British officials, the scholars and the missionaries all joined. The Singh Sabha, the brainchild of professor Leitner, kings college was to become there most lethal weapon in putting into practice their plan to separate the Sikh sect of Hinduism from Hinduism.

In order to separate the Sikhs, they were even made into a sect of Islam. for example,one Thomas Patrick Hughes, who had worked as missionary for twenty years in Peshawar, edited the dictionary of Islam. the work itself is scholarly but, like most European scholarship, it had a colonial inspiration. the third biggest article in this work, after Muhammad and the Quran, is on Sikhism. it devotes one fourth of a page to the Sunnis and, somewhat more justly,seven pages to the Shias, but devotes eleven and a half pages to the Sikhs! probably, the editor himself thought it rather excessive; for he offers an explanation to the orientalists who "may perhaps be surprised to find that Sikhism has been treated as a sect of Islam." indeed, it is surprising to the non-orientalists too. for it must be a strange sect of Islam where the word 'Muhammad' does not occur even once in the writings of its founder, Nanak. but the inclusion of such an article "in the present work seemed to be most desirable." it was a policy matter.

Most non-specialist Western sources implicitly support Sikh separatism, at least the religious, non-territorial variety. Thus, the cover story on India in the non-political American monthly National Geographic carries a picture of a typical-looking Sikh before the Hari Mandir in Amritsar, with the caption: "The Golden Temple in Amritsar serves as the spiritual centre for the world’s 20 million Sikhs. ‘From Hindus and Muslims have I broken free’, said Arjan Dev Ji, the fifth Sikh guru, in the 1590s. The faith holds all people equal in the eyes of God."

Of these three sentences, two are statements of support to Sikh separatism, and both are open to criticism.

The second sentence in the National Geographic caption, Guru Arjun’s statement, is superficially a crystal-clear ex-pression of Sikh separateness. Yet, it is not as straightforward as separatists might wish. No Sikh Guru was ever a Muslim, ergo the half-sentence: "Of Muslims have I broken free", does not mean that he abandoned Islam. Therefore, the other half need not be construed as a repudiation of Hinduism either. Nanaks "neither Hindu, nor muslim" should be read as repudiating the whole 'identity' business including the division of mankind into Hindu and Muslim categories, on the Upanishadic ground that the Self is beyond these superficial trappings (the Self being neti neti, "not this, not that") and that is a typically Hindu and decidedly un-Islamic position.

To the Quran, group identity (being a member of the Muslim ummah or not) is everything, is laden with far-reaching consequences including an eternity in heaven or in hell. To Hindu society, it is also undeniably important; but to Hindu spirituality, it is not. Likewise, another verse of the same poem, "I will not pray to idols nor say the Muslim prayer", is more anti-Islamic than anti-Hindu: it rejects a duty binding every single Muslim (prayer) and a practice common among Hindus (idol-worship) but by no means obligatory.

If we accept the historical definition of 'Hindu' given by the Muslims, there is simply no doubt about it: all Sikhs fall under the heading 'Indian Pagans, for they are neither Muslims nor Christians, Jews or Parsis. So, Sikhs are Hindus. Unless Sikhs are some kind of Muslims.

The religion of Nanak was never intended as a compromise between Hinduism and Muhammadanism, but it is in some quarters even be spoken of as the religion of a Muhammadan sect. The question may be asked whether the alleged non-polytheism of Guru Nanak really is the same thing as the Biblical-Quranic worship of a jealous God. The Quran decides on eternal heaven and eternal hell on the basis of communal identity. As per the Quran, all 'unbelievers' (Sikhs as much as Hindus.....even Nanak) carry a one-way ticket to hell. Mian Mir, Baba Farid, and Sufis pirs were hardly talking about this jealous God.

Nanak’s worship of the timeless One, 'Akala', and the reforming creeds of today, born under the influence of the West, draw away from the limitations of western or Semitic monotheism. Irresistibly they turn from these infantile conceptions towards the fathomless truth of Vedanta. Christians in debate with Islam loudly affirm : the fact that both your God and my God are described as single and unique, does not imply that they are the same.

Read my Posts #1 & 3

Thanks

- -
- -
 

gorakhnathdatilla

BIRHA TU SULTAN
agree one hundered percent.. ehnu ban karo yaar.. mera v dimaag kharaab hi si jo main ehdi support karda riha.. i am sorry to all the guys here.. :nerd
o nai yaar main ta kenda asin sikh christanity to bane haaan..

bhia saab bhai jesus singh je western side waaleya ne hi sade guruan nu raah dkhaya c lagda.. :nerd



dekh bai bulle na asin hindua cho na asin musalmaana cho.. u c baba jesus de daadi v c lambe lambe baal v c.. :roll:roll:roll

ina bot hai k singhaa ne una to hi gyaan prapat kita thru gurus..

hun khush hai..

tu kaanu fajool di kaanwa rouli payi k sikh eh sikh oho. tu jidan kenda udan man lende haaan.. :roll:roll:roll
tu chanda ki hain oh das..









oo sach hun tu kena k CHRISTANITY = KRISHAN+NITI so ultimately asin hinduaa to hi aye ne

rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

bro u r funny seriously
 

Ravan

*****AKA-JATT*****
as far i know it was a group formed to protect the country or world from some immoral things, groups, etc.

yes it was, like u r a part of huminity.

sombody might have changed his religion to sikhism, but i don't who was he or she.

anything else u want to know ?
 

hooneey

Well-known member
wah oye bulle shah. je tu sikh aen ta sharam karin zara. nale tenu ik gal dasan ah jehda tu copy paste wala kam fadiya na ehnu chad ke jo apne guru sahib ne apan nu padan nu dita se na( granth sahab) oh padlae. tere sare sawala da jawab tenu milzu , ure ehoje betuke sawal ni puchenga.kadi garath sahib aap pad ke dekhiya vi ae? pata ni kehde kehde writers de refrence de ke tu ik mahan dharam da naas mari janae.bai mein tere naal hamesha behsan nu hamesha avoid kita,but cant control here.
JEHDE MAWAN DE PUTTAN NU OHNA SAHMNE MAARDE SI,AURTAN DI IZZAT LUTDE SI, JINHA DE SEHANSAH NE KASAM KHADI SI KE OH HAR ROZ 1000 SIKHAN NU MAAR KE ROTI KAHANGE, JINA NE GURU SAHIBAN NU TATI TAWI TE BITHAYIA , ARIYAN NAL CHIRYA , SIKHA DIYA KHOPDIYA LAH DITYA. TE JINNHA NU KHATAM KARAN LAI GURU SAHIBAN NE APNIYE MAA BAAP TE SAHIBZADE KURBAN KAR DITE, JINHA DI GURU GOBIND SINGH JI NE JAD PAT DITI , TU SIKH NU OHNA DI SECT DASDAEN.
NAALE HUN APNE COPY PASTE APNE TAK HI RAKHIN, MERE KOL MERE GRANTH SAHIB HAN.

PPL SRRY MEIN KUCH JIYADA HI SENSTIVE HO GAYA. U KNW WHY, COZ MIEN KAI VAR SAHEEDHI JOD MELE (FATHEGARH SAHAB) GAYAEN, N MEIN OTHE BANDIYAN NU ROONDE DEKHIYA SAHIBZADEYAN NU YAAD KARDE HOYE.TE IK EHNU DEKH LO.
N ONE THINK MORE AH COPY PASTE DOESNT MK ANY SENS.COZ FROM WHERE U R GETTING DIS IS DERE OWN PERSONAL COCEPTIONS N VIEWS.
 

onlycheema

Banned
bai BUNY prob is this guy just copy pastes arbit things....n never gives point to point answers to any questions u ask him.......just comes wid another so long long materials which dunt make any sense unless u r insane.

so no point arguing wid him......dhillon bai ehnu bada pyaar kardaa bass taahi ehe ethe aa hajey takk.
 

hooneey

Well-known member
bai agree wd u. mein tan kehna ehnu ethon hi nahi, ehnu tan sikh panth vicho chek dena chahidae.(if he is a sikh)
 

full_taur

Member
but guys.. just understand what he is trying to say here.. in ojen of the post he says that sikhism is a part of hinduism... in other post, he says sikhism is a part of islam....

But essentially he is missing the common point that

SIKHISM IS FOR HUMANITY...

& indirectly he is proving it by quoting Hinduism and islamism in sikhism.. so this shows how great this religion is that it gives respect to each & every religion...
 
Top