pink puma
Elite
Hello to all UNPians,
I am currently taking a course called "Human Rights & Democracy in Asia" and we are learning much in regards to human rights violations in places like China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, as well as parts of India. As i was coming home today, i was on the bus and i was thinking of how human rights violations in india are often attributed to maintaining culture.
For example, many of you have probably heard of stories where daughters are killed by their fathers or brothers or uncles, because the daughter did something which was considered shameful for the family, such as finding a boyfriend. In such a case where the father kills his daughter, this has been referred to as "Honour Killings." Meaning the daughter is killed so as to maintain family honour in the eyes of society.
Now of course democratic thought and the Western world view such "honour killings" as a direct violation of human rights and thus they intervene in societies like India and China to stop such violations and murders from occuring. However, the traditional countries in Asia argue that the Western world is invading their country because honour killings are a way to preserve culture and therefore they do not view it as a human rights violation, they view it as something that helps to keep discipline and order within the family.
I would like you all to share your views on this. Do you think the western world should impose their ideas of what human rights should be on traditional countries? Or do you think such countries should be able to decide what constitutes as a human rights violation by themselves? Is it fair for the Western world to be telling Asian countries what is right and what is wrong? Because as we all know, there is no right and wrong in this world. Everything depends on how each individual percieves what is good and what is bad. What is good to one person can be bad to another.
So please comment on this topic, i would love to know how you all feel about this.
Love,
Pink Puma
I am currently taking a course called "Human Rights & Democracy in Asia" and we are learning much in regards to human rights violations in places like China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, as well as parts of India. As i was coming home today, i was on the bus and i was thinking of how human rights violations in india are often attributed to maintaining culture.
For example, many of you have probably heard of stories where daughters are killed by their fathers or brothers or uncles, because the daughter did something which was considered shameful for the family, such as finding a boyfriend. In such a case where the father kills his daughter, this has been referred to as "Honour Killings." Meaning the daughter is killed so as to maintain family honour in the eyes of society.
Now of course democratic thought and the Western world view such "honour killings" as a direct violation of human rights and thus they intervene in societies like India and China to stop such violations and murders from occuring. However, the traditional countries in Asia argue that the Western world is invading their country because honour killings are a way to preserve culture and therefore they do not view it as a human rights violation, they view it as something that helps to keep discipline and order within the family.
I would like you all to share your views on this. Do you think the western world should impose their ideas of what human rights should be on traditional countries? Or do you think such countries should be able to decide what constitutes as a human rights violation by themselves? Is it fair for the Western world to be telling Asian countries what is right and what is wrong? Because as we all know, there is no right and wrong in this world. Everything depends on how each individual percieves what is good and what is bad. What is good to one person can be bad to another.
So please comment on this topic, i would love to know how you all feel about this.
Love,
Pink Puma