This verse will smash the Aryan theory into pieces :
vyabhicarati taveksa
hy abhihito bhagavato dharmah
sthira-cara-sattva-kadambesv
yam upasate tv aryah
na - not; vyabhicarati - fails; tava - Your; iksa - outlook; yaya - by which; hi - indeed; abhihitah - declared;
bhagavatah - in relationship with Your instructions and activities; dharmah - religious principle;
sthira - nonmoving; cara - moving; sattva-kadambesu - among the living entities;
aprthak-dhiyah - who do not consider distinctions; yam - which; upasate - follow; tu - certainly;
aryah - those who are advanced in civilization.
"My dear Lord, one's occupational duty is instructed in Srimad-Bhagavatam according to Your
point of view, which never deviates from the highest goal of life. Those who follow their occupational
duties under Your supervision, being equal to all living entities, moving and nonmoving, and not
considering high and low, are called Aryans. Such Aryans worship You, the supreme lord."
"Your outlook in relation to the dharma of Your instructions and activities is declared to be infallible;
following that making no distinctions between the nonmoving and moving living beings is one
certainly of the civilized [the Aryans]."
Srimad Bhagavad Purana canto 6, chapter 16 verse 43
http://bhagavata.org/canto6/chapter16.html
- -
- -
There are things about the Veda's which don't really exist but are discussed by people out to denounce Hinduism. Come to think of it even Nanak mentioned stuff about the Veda's which do not really exist thereby raising a question as to whether Nanak had actually read them.
The Arya's were nothing but people who worshiped the Elements of nature and all the hymn's in the RigVeda are attributed to them i.e. Agni, Vayu, Asvins, Varuna, Ritu, Marut etc. These are not Human being's but symbol's of the Elements.
The 'Aryan Invasion theory' also is a myth. Aryans are indegenious people.
The hero of the Mahabharata, Krishna, was a 'Jadhav' and a Bihari...and was a darkie.
Rama, another famous Aryan too was a darkie. And 'Jadhav' are OBC candidates.
The Aryans are not a race at all leave alone an Indo-European one.
No text in the entire world other than the Ancient Indian texts or the Ancient Iranian text 'Avestha' that mentions the term 'Aryan' or 'Arya' and the term is never even once used to describe some race, community, country or even a village. It's used to address people of repute like a King or a Priest.
Arya is a Sanskrit term used by Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and others. It means master, noble, lord" or can refer to any Vaishya. In Avestan, the word is airyan.
Aryan is an English word derived from the Indo-Aryan Vedic Sanskrit and Iranian Avestan terms ari, arya, and/or the extended form aryana. The Old Persian ariya, is a cognate as well. Beyond its use as the ethnic self-designation of the Proto-Indo-Iranians, the meaning 'noble" has been attached to it in Sanskrit.
During the 19th century, following Max Mulle's 'Aryan invasion theory', the term gained an added meaning, being used in the West to refer to what are now called the 'Proto-Indo-Europeans', and, by extension, to the Indo-European speaking peoples as a whole. In linguistics, the term Aryan currently refers only to the Indo-Iranian language sub-family.
The only purpose behind creating this myth of Aryan's having arrived from Europe was to give the White's an exaggerated sense of self-esteem by the colonialists.
The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have somebody write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new history. Before long that nation will begin to forget what it is and what it was... The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting. But in India memory never fails.
Let me quote here Swami Vivekananda :
"There is not one word in our scriptures, not one, to prove that the Aryans ever came from
anywhere outside India.... The whole of India is Aryan, nothing else."
That the Dravidians fled to the South as is supposed, could be questioned as to why they should have forgotten the famous Indus script on the way, so that no trace of it is found in Southern India, and the oldest extant Tamil inscriptions had to wait another two thousand years, that too in the Brahmi script? Similarly, nowhere do we find in the South artefacts associated with Harappan culture, much less any trace of the urban skills found in Indus cities—in fact urbanization in the South grew only from the third century B.C., probably under Mauryan and Roman influences.
Dravida is a term that represented various identities throughout the history of India. The ambiguity of the term has continued even today as sometimes it denotes people of South India, sometimes speakers of Dravidian languages.
This Sanskrit word is believed to be an equivalent of Prakrit form of the word Tamil.
The Dravidan influence is to be found all over the remains of the Indus valley civilization and the Dravidan are as Aryan as Aryan is. The first time the aryan were referred to as a race it was by William Jones in 1790. Friedrich Schlegel(German poet, critic and scholar) in 1808, postulated that India was the source of the language. They adopted the term "Indo-Germanic.
This famous female fugurine from Mohen-jo-Daro certainly doesn't look even remotely like European which is known to have influenced the so called aryan culture.
- -
- -
Thanks.
vyabhicarati taveksa
hy abhihito bhagavato dharmah
sthira-cara-sattva-kadambesv
yam upasate tv aryah
na - not; vyabhicarati - fails; tava - Your; iksa - outlook; yaya - by which; hi - indeed; abhihitah - declared;
bhagavatah - in relationship with Your instructions and activities; dharmah - religious principle;
sthira - nonmoving; cara - moving; sattva-kadambesu - among the living entities;
aprthak-dhiyah - who do not consider distinctions; yam - which; upasate - follow; tu - certainly;
aryah - those who are advanced in civilization.
"My dear Lord, one's occupational duty is instructed in Srimad-Bhagavatam according to Your
point of view, which never deviates from the highest goal of life. Those who follow their occupational
duties under Your supervision, being equal to all living entities, moving and nonmoving, and not
considering high and low, are called Aryans. Such Aryans worship You, the supreme lord."
"Your outlook in relation to the dharma of Your instructions and activities is declared to be infallible;
following that making no distinctions between the nonmoving and moving living beings is one
certainly of the civilized [the Aryans]."
Srimad Bhagavad Purana canto 6, chapter 16 verse 43
http://bhagavata.org/canto6/chapter16.html
- -
- -
There are things about the Veda's which don't really exist but are discussed by people out to denounce Hinduism. Come to think of it even Nanak mentioned stuff about the Veda's which do not really exist thereby raising a question as to whether Nanak had actually read them.
The Arya's were nothing but people who worshiped the Elements of nature and all the hymn's in the RigVeda are attributed to them i.e. Agni, Vayu, Asvins, Varuna, Ritu, Marut etc. These are not Human being's but symbol's of the Elements.
The 'Aryan Invasion theory' also is a myth. Aryans are indegenious people.
The hero of the Mahabharata, Krishna, was a 'Jadhav' and a Bihari...and was a darkie.
Rama, another famous Aryan too was a darkie. And 'Jadhav' are OBC candidates.
The Aryans are not a race at all leave alone an Indo-European one.
No text in the entire world other than the Ancient Indian texts or the Ancient Iranian text 'Avestha' that mentions the term 'Aryan' or 'Arya' and the term is never even once used to describe some race, community, country or even a village. It's used to address people of repute like a King or a Priest.
Arya is a Sanskrit term used by Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and others. It means master, noble, lord" or can refer to any Vaishya. In Avestan, the word is airyan.
Aryan is an English word derived from the Indo-Aryan Vedic Sanskrit and Iranian Avestan terms ari, arya, and/or the extended form aryana. The Old Persian ariya, is a cognate as well. Beyond its use as the ethnic self-designation of the Proto-Indo-Iranians, the meaning 'noble" has been attached to it in Sanskrit.
During the 19th century, following Max Mulle's 'Aryan invasion theory', the term gained an added meaning, being used in the West to refer to what are now called the 'Proto-Indo-Europeans', and, by extension, to the Indo-European speaking peoples as a whole. In linguistics, the term Aryan currently refers only to the Indo-Iranian language sub-family.
The only purpose behind creating this myth of Aryan's having arrived from Europe was to give the White's an exaggerated sense of self-esteem by the colonialists.
The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have somebody write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new history. Before long that nation will begin to forget what it is and what it was... The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting. But in India memory never fails.
Let me quote here Swami Vivekananda :
"There is not one word in our scriptures, not one, to prove that the Aryans ever came from
anywhere outside India.... The whole of India is Aryan, nothing else."
That the Dravidians fled to the South as is supposed, could be questioned as to why they should have forgotten the famous Indus script on the way, so that no trace of it is found in Southern India, and the oldest extant Tamil inscriptions had to wait another two thousand years, that too in the Brahmi script? Similarly, nowhere do we find in the South artefacts associated with Harappan culture, much less any trace of the urban skills found in Indus cities—in fact urbanization in the South grew only from the third century B.C., probably under Mauryan and Roman influences.
Dravida is a term that represented various identities throughout the history of India. The ambiguity of the term has continued even today as sometimes it denotes people of South India, sometimes speakers of Dravidian languages.
This Sanskrit word is believed to be an equivalent of Prakrit form of the word Tamil.
The Dravidan influence is to be found all over the remains of the Indus valley civilization and the Dravidan are as Aryan as Aryan is. The first time the aryan were referred to as a race it was by William Jones in 1790. Friedrich Schlegel(German poet, critic and scholar) in 1808, postulated that India was the source of the language. They adopted the term "Indo-Germanic.
This famous female fugurine from Mohen-jo-Daro certainly doesn't look even remotely like European which is known to have influenced the so called aryan culture.
- -
- -
Thanks.
