Why do we need religion? Allow me to push the Envelop...

Ramta

Member
- -
- -

I’m not a RSS agent out to ruin your faith (lol), I have serious questions that need to be addressed (you have to understand that your world, your friends, your social influences are different from mine – im not an anti-Sikh, I am just posting questions that my peers and myself are developing to become better Sikhs, or in that context remain Sikhs, lol). I myself am a Sikh. But criticism is key in my argument and if you can’t cope with that please do not respond. We must challenge faith not only as an institution but also from a unique historical perspective.

I believe the moral principles that the BANI teaches, I can but only try to live life according to its teaching, I acknowledge the magnificent roles the Sikh faith has played in HISTORY and even TODAY, I love much of the teachings of the guru’s but does that mean I must follow everything my guru tells me without questioning it? Religion is being transcended by atheism and humanism you can choose to ignore my question, but that will harm the faith rather that improve it! Rolling back your conservative “whip” is a short term and rather shaky solution. You asked me to focus my attention on God, I’m sorry that’s not the solution; faith is a social process an individual cannot strengthen faith at there own will. Does questioning my religion make me less of a Sikh than yourself

All things considered I look forward to your response, spare me the suspense!

They say the Sikhs are moving liberally? How can you possibly believe that? Sikhism is a faith that implements a high degree of social control, the five k’s are but a prime example. We are a faith that believes in many unproven tales that contradicts reason and intellect, a faith that at time provides strong moral development but adds, “insult to reason”. EXAMPLES : The Sikh Sakhis.

I will only accept responses from the gurbani itself or from a credible source not something your parents told you as a bedtime story. No shononogan responses that add insult to reason as with my previous post. Like -- “a befitting lesson to those who mess with us”-- WOW I’m not even going to comment on that one! Who do you mean us? In a way I am messing with the “us” do I deserve your conservative whip?

OK...

http://www.gurbani.org/webart216.htm ...read the first paragraph made by the SGGS this is a CREDITED site that interprets the gurbani! The gurbani is full of contradictions such as these that should be re-interpreted, modified somehow to make more sense!

“The Gurbani indicates that all suffering is of the human mind; for it's the mind that is the cause for sorrows or discomfort. Therefore, the root cause of man's all suffering lies in the human mind itself. To help us, accordingly, there is tremendous coverage of the mind's functioning and control in the Gurbani. "Deluded mind thinks of all sorts of corruption" and "This mind is ruined by its attachment to Maya", says the Gurbani. The Gurbani goes on to say, "The mind is in the control of evil passions, evil intent, and duality." The external mind being the false ego-sense or Haume, its faults are lust, anger, greed, emotional attachment, self-conceit, enviousness, stubborn mindedness (and their numerous variations). The subtle defects of such intrinsic mind are inner impurity, restlessness, and ignorance. Thus, the external mind can be compared with the eclipsed moon. If such faulty and deluded mind is allowed to run our life, the result will undoubtedly be repeated suffering.”

WOW, that seems pretty conservative to me. Gurbani just insulted the human mind as corrupt it says that it is delusional. But was not the human mind made by GOD, are we not his children are we not a relfection of God? Why would God make the construct of the mind in attachment to maya or why would GOD design a corrupt mind? How could God design a courrupt mind without the existence of corruption within his own? What kind of God gives us a sick twisted mind and then expects us to repair it via gurbani? This is what I mean when I’m saying that Sikhism like many other religions is missing its base.

The gurbanical INTERPRETATION goes on to say that : “Mind is Negativity” and we should “rid ourselves of this negativity and hate”. From a contextual sense the gurbani tells us the reason why we are unhappy is because our mind is filled with negative thoughts.

Why is negativity so hated, negativity ensures a species survival, negativity gives meaning to life, negation is the natural process by which a newer more powerful transcendental type immerges. Complaining (which is the done through negation) is an integral part of our democratic system. Were the guru’s against the system of democracy? If everyone was happy there would be no such thing as action, no cause or effect, no change. Negativity within our mind gives meaning to life, it gives us a feeling of becoming better.

We see negation in nature: the negative aspects of a species will be rectified and lead to their perpetual survival (classical intuitive Darwinian theory).

Now this concerns the theory of karma!

To say that you will be rewarded on how you perform in this life is lame! Is a child that is born into poverty deserve it?
The ideology of Karma is an effective tool of social control:
The Hindu culture used karmian ideology so that the elite could validate their position in society and preserve their power and the caste system. ”We are rich and we deserve to be rich because we were good in our past life”

Our guru’s also implemented the karmian ideology for social control and OBEDIENCE but a different form of social control. Do good or you will be punished,: “do good now and you will be rewarded in the next life” was the overall take home message of our guru’s.

This was in no way a truly evolved thought from the Hindu culture for it too supports egoism. People do good not because they want to but because they have to, we were not given a choice. We either do good or suffer. This psychologically is very burdening and expresses not the good nature in humanity but an egoistic one.
Sikhs do good to fuel their own ego, to ensure themselves that they will be better off in the afterlife?
Theories on Karma undermine current life, our “current life” is nothing more than a preparation for another life.
GIVE ME A BREAK!
This teaching should be abandoned if we want to preserve what is precious in this life, the one in which we are sure that we exist!
Read some Marxian ideology to get a better view of what I’m talking about here!

Thanks

REMEMBER OBJECTIVITY IS KEY IN THIS ARGUMENT.
If only the guru’s where alive, I would question them
till the last breath in my body.

- -
- -
 

gurinder_gidda

Sohni Muteyar
- -
- -

I’m not a RSS agent out to ruin your faith (lol), I have serious questions that need to be addressed (you have to understand that your world, your friends, your social influences are different from mine – im not an anti-Sikh, I am just posting questions that my peers and myself are developing to become better Sikhs, or in that context remain Sikhs, lol). I myself am a Sikh. But criticism is key in my argument and if you can’t cope with that please do not respond. We must challenge faith not only as an institution but also from a unique historical perspective.

I believe the moral principles that the BANI teaches, I can but only try to live life according to its teaching, I acknowledge the magnificent roles the Sikh faith has played in HISTORY and even TODAY, I love much of the teachings of the guru’s but does that mean I must follow everything my guru tells me without questioning it? Religion is being transcended by atheism and humanism you can choose to ignore my question, but that will harm the faith rather that improve it! Rolling back your conservative “whip” is a short term and rather shaky solution. You asked me to focus my attention on God, I’m sorry that’s not the solution; faith is a social process an individual cannot strengthen faith at there own will. Does questioning my religion make me less of a Sikh than yourself

All things considered I look forward to your response, spare me the suspense!

They say the Sikhs are moving liberally? How can you possibly believe that? Sikhism is a faith that implements a high degree of social control, the five k’s are but a prime example. We are a faith that believes in many unproven tales that contradicts reason and intellect, a faith that at time provides strong moral development but adds, “insult to reason”. EXAMPLES : The Sikh Sakhis.

I will only accept responses from the gurbani itself or from a credible source not something your parents told you as a bedtime story. No shononogan responses that add insult to reason as with my previous post. Like -- “a befitting lesson to those who mess with us”-- WOW I’m not even going to comment on that one! Who do you mean us? In a way I am messing with the “us” do I deserve your conservative whip?

OK...

http://www.gurbani.org/webart216.htm ...read the first paragraph made by the SGGS this is a CREDITED site that interprets the gurbani! The gurbani is full of contradictions such as these that should be re-interpreted, modified somehow to make more sense!

“The Gurbani indicates that all suffering is of the human mind; for it's the mind that is the cause for sorrows or discomfort. Therefore, the root cause of man's all suffering lies in the human mind itself. To help us, accordingly, there is tremendous coverage of the mind's functioning and control in the Gurbani. "Deluded mind thinks of all sorts of corruption" and "This mind is ruined by its attachment to Maya", says the Gurbani. The Gurbani goes on to say, "The mind is in the control of evil passions, evil intent, and duality." The external mind being the false ego-sense or Haume, its faults are lust, anger, greed, emotional attachment, self-conceit, enviousness, stubborn mindedness (and their numerous variations). The subtle defects of such intrinsic mind are inner impurity, restlessness, and ignorance. Thus, the external mind can be compared with the eclipsed moon. If such faulty and deluded mind is allowed to run our life, the result will undoubtedly be repeated suffering.”

WOW, that seems pretty conservative to me. Gurbani just insulted the human mind as corrupt it says that it is delusional. But was not the human mind made by GOD, are we not his children are we not a relfection of God? Why would God make the construct of the mind in attachment to maya or why would GOD design a corrupt mind? How could God design a courrupt mind without the existence of corruption within his own? What kind of God gives us a sick twisted mind and then expects us to repair it via gurbani? This is what I mean when I’m saying that Sikhism like many other religions is missing its base.

The gurbanical INTERPRETATION goes on to say that : “Mind is Negativity” and we should “rid ourselves of this negativity and hate”. From a contextual sense the gurbani tells us the reason why we are unhappy is because our mind is filled with negative thoughts.

Why is negativity so hated, negativity ensures a species survival, negativity gives meaning to life, negation is the natural process by which a newer more powerful transcendental type immerges. Complaining (which is the done through negation) is an integral part of our democratic system. Were the guru’s against the system of democracy? If everyone was happy there would be no such thing as action, no cause or effect, no change. Negativity within our mind gives meaning to life, it gives us a feeling of becoming better.

We see negation in nature: the negative aspects of a species will be rectified and lead to their perpetual survival (classical intuitive Darwinian theory).

Now this concerns the theory of karma!

To say that you will be rewarded on how you perform in this life is lame! Is a child that is born into poverty deserve it?
The ideology of Karma is an effective tool of social control:
The Hindu culture used karmian ideology so that the elite could validate their position in society and preserve their power and the caste system. ”We are rich and we deserve to be rich because we were good in our past life”

Our guru’s also implemented the karmian ideology for social control and OBEDIENCE but a different form of social control. Do good or you will be punished,: “do good now and you will be rewarded in the next life” was the overall take home message of our guru’s.

This was in no way a truly evolved thought from the Hindu culture for it too supports egoism. People do good not because they want to but because they have to, we were not given a choice. We either do good or suffer. This psychologically is very burdening and expresses not the good nature in humanity but an egoistic one.
Sikhs do good to fuel their own ego, to ensure themselves that they will be better off in the afterlife?
Theories on Karma undermine current life, our “current life” is nothing more than a preparation for another life.
GIVE ME A BREAK!
This teaching should be abandoned if we want to preserve what is precious in this life, the one in which we are sure that we exist!
Read some Marxian ideology to get a better view of what I’m talking about here!

Thanks

REMEMBER OBJECTIVITY IS KEY IN THIS ARGUMENT.
If only the guru’s where alive, I would question them
till the last breath in my body.

- -
- -

Bhulle Shah ji main zarur reply kardi j e thread punjabi vich likheya hunda. Jida ke main tuhanu har post vich kendi hain.
 

gurinder_gidda

Sohni Muteyar
punjabi te bulle nu aandi nahi...sadde naal pange len laggaa

Le hale tak tuhanu e pata hi nahi ke onu bahut soni punjabi bolani aundi hai. One apne hi ek thread de vich punjabi vich mainu reply kita c. J tusi onu kahoge te o zarur punjabi vich reply karega.:an

:pbbol Bhulle Shah G
 
Le hale tak tuhanu e pata hi nahi ke onu bahut soni punjabi bolani aundi hai. One apne hi ek thread de vich punjabi vich mainu reply kita c. J tusi onu kahoge te o zarur punjabi vich reply karega.:an

:pbbol Bhulle Shah G

use din tou main v jawab punjabi ch dene shuru kar ditte c ate hamesha meri gal padh ke jawab dinda rea.........hun akda .......:nerd
 

Ramta

Member
- -
- -

Be that as it may, I have every right to express my opinion and have
every right to call myself a devout Sikh! I'm just different thats all-- I
will post many things in the future in favour of sikhism im pretty sure
everyone will agree with those.

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]One thing you can agree on with me is that this is a lively debate on
the entire forum section? to that I say; job well done.

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]but I'm still missing the answer to my questions, wanna take a stab at [/FONT]
[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif]them--> the former questions I posted on negation and karmanian ideology.[/FONT]

You call a sikh someone who does not question his faith! well at least
I'm an honest sikh - I dont hide what I would like to ask, I dont conform
to the norm, I know the questions I posted will stir something at the
subconcious level and people who deny that.... well are liars
A true sikh is an honest sikh... don't you agree?

If only the guru’s where alive, I would question them
till the last breath in my body.

I am a Sikh and I wish to learn) and so so should you. Sikh mean's Sikshak,
student on a quest of knowledge and understanding so as to discard ignorance.
But what do we see around us. Are Sikh living upto their name ??
I don't like like it as so would you but it's a truth though a bitter one,
that our people are allergic to knowledge, gyaan, vidya, studies...
It's true whether we like it or not. Our people run away from education.
Said the Great-Master, "This is a Grantha and your very own Grantha".
And our people lost their head.

Maade Jatt katori labbi paanee pee pee aaphar gaya.
And now look at them. They carry it on their head, place it under a chatri,
fan it so as flies won't sit on it. I thing it would make our community
a better Sikh were they to put that granth down from that pedestal
they have placed it on. AND READ IT.

Do to the Grantha what a Grantha is meant to be done with.

Sikhism is the evolution of Human along with the environment he/she
is a part of towards a higher and a better understanding.

NOW...

Clarification of NEGATIOIN:
In my main post the Highlight is :
How can god construct a mind that is evil if there is no evil within god?
I just higlighted a CONTRADICTION in the INTERPRETATION of the
SGGS... while they were interpreting our Gurbani! ...my intention is
to show how even our interpreters (the conservatives) the very people
who are responsible for spreading the word of our faith are at
the same time endangering the integrity of our faith.

Your not understanding the underlying meaining:
"look no further men, for you are the authors of evil"!
We must define god as an entity that is beyond good and evil!
God cannot be evil (SGGS by posting that did not consider
the contrdictive theory that could arise).

Why is lust ego and anger bad things...
I veiw them as purely natural instincts that can be seen in nature.
Ego is what drives us (especially if you beleive in karma),
anger is an innate motion essential for our survival,
lust is purely hormonal!

I am a fool in a foolish world,
But even fools can speak of truth.

God may have no care for maya but we are materialistic beings and we do care.
We should care, maya ensures our survival, without it we would die. Attaining
maya and other worldly resources (provided by god for us to use) is good,
why else would god put resources on the planet. Was it God’s agenda for
us to scavenge like animals and farm like ants? I think not! Humanity was[/FONT]
destined and designed for greatness, to build and to destroy.

Maya is essential for livelihood, there's no other grounds for existence.
Ever since the early hunter gathering societies that traded goods to
todays capitilisitic empires.

The only way to fight maya is through socialism. Is this what our guru’s yearned for?
Would our guru’s say something like this:
“everyone according to their ability, and everyone according to their need”?
I ask again:
Were the guru’s trying to construct a Utopian society? Were the guru’s proto-communists?
The guru’s told us to strip ourselves of our greed for maya, how do we do this
unless we live in a commune...
it cannot be achieved on the individual level (this point is not debatable)?

Read my questions and give me a fair response and I agree that I will not encourage
others to critique the faith, but I will continue to question my faith and perhaps stir

some lively debate in these areas.

This is no pompous shows of knowledge?? these are everyday questions that any
average university student would ask him/herself in the back of their minds at the
sub-concious level.

And you can use gurbani along with any other source (scholarly), as have I, to caste
a response and disregard what I wrote above...I was typing faster than I was thinking.
Use your own contextual interpretation to prove me wrong.

And please don't get all reved up, remember this is a learning process
and if you don't consider life to be a learning process you are not a sikh.

The Sikh path for me is a path not of experience but a path that will lead to
“greater knowledge” (primarily, knowledge on the STATE of my existence,
which is why religion was made in the first place). People take on an empiricist
argument here when they refer to Sikhi as an experience. The only thing that
is “experienced” in Sikhism is what we do as the “collective”. The rituals we
perform give us a sense of belonging; it places us in the greater social order
and gives us an identity, nothing more..
(note: I’m not undermining the importance of ritual after all they define us).

If I were to break from the view that religion is not here to “give me greater knowledge
of my state of existence” and is nothing but mere “experience” then I will lose the

direction in which I want to point my life. Experience cannot tell us why we are here.
(No matter how much experience you have, of religion, of life experiences, they will
not guide you to the meaning of life... Only reason and knowledge of the faith itself
can guide you on that path!

Im sorry if I sound too Weberian...

But...Empiricism is not the way to lay the mind at rest. Even if it is a resting mind
it's a dead one for me. A mind that is not questioning, a mind that is not thinking
but just interpreting experience is not a mind. Not everything can be done through
experience...many things call on reason.

Now tell me...

...what is the motivation that you get up every morning to go to work??
Does god give you your motivation?? Is it because you like to??
Or is it because you have to??
What motivates you more, your will to make money and ensure
your+families survival or God’s motivation??

The honest answer for any man, regardless of religion, race, creed is the latter.
They said that the guru’s will is to detach humanity’s lust from maya...
ascetic words and no more...

Ask yourself this..
Do I have a bank account in which I accumulate my cash ??
Do I balance my budget?? Do I want a new computer someday
so that i can keep replying to BulleShah??

...detachment from maya is impossible, maya and all the calculations
that come with it consume us at one point in our life or another.
Maya is impossible to let go of (unless of course if we surrender
to the commune and have no more need for money).

So now I will ask you...

Do you live what Guru-Granth preach? Of course not.
Can you live what Guru-Granth preach? Of course not.

The only way you can detach yourself from maya is if you live in the most purest
communist state (which cannot exist), your goals of so called EXPERIENCING SIKHI
are useless and impossible in this world! This is why I turned to reason and intellect
not empiricism, no one can practice pure sikhi, especially when there's continous
lurking concerns for maya to ensure ones survival.

To call the sikh way of life as a quest for detachment of maya is nonsense,
especially when the same sikh goes to pray in a temple shrouded with gold!

...and have you observed something funny...
The only people who don't care for maya or lust for it
are the ones who have it!

Thanks

My next posts will be on Lust, Ego and Hatred...

- -
- -
 
Top